A diamond grading report can make a stone easier to identify, compare and sell. However, two reports displaying similar carat, colour and clarity information do not necessarily create identical resale offers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Professional buyers consider which laboratory issued the report, what type of report it is, whether it can be verified and whether the physical diamond still matches the documented characteristics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Market recognition also matters. A report familiar to the buyer\u2019s intended resale market may reduce uncertainty and make the diamond easier to place. An unfamiliar, limited or unverifiable report may require additional testing or regrading before a final offer can be confirmed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
GIA, IGI and HRD Antwerp are all established laboratories offering diamond-report services. The relevant question is not simply which name is \u201cbest.\u201d It is which report applies to the diamond, how the market interprets it and whether the documented results are supported by physical examination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Yes. The grading laboratory can affect buyer confidence, market comparability and the cost or risk of verifying the diamond.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
For many internationally traded natural loose diamonds, a verifiable GIA report provides broad market familiarity. IGI reports are widely encountered across natural, laboratory-grown and finished-jewellery categories. HRD Antwerp reports are familiar within Antwerp and many European diamond markets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This does not mean that every GIA-graded diamond receives a higher offer than every IGI- or HRD-graded diamond. A current, verifiable report that accurately matches an attractive diamond may be more useful than an older report from another laboratory that no longer reflects the stone\u2019s condition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The report does not determine the purchase price. The physical diamond, its origin, quality, condition and current demand remain decisive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A diamond grading report records the gemological characteristics observed when a laboratory examined the diamond.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Depending on the laboratory and service, the report may state whether the diamond is natural or laboratory-grown and document its carat weight, colour, clarity, shape, measurements, cut, polish, symmetry and fluorescence. It may also contain a proportions diagram, clarity plot, comments, treatment information and laser-inscription details.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A grading report is not normally a monetary valuation. It describes the diamond but does not state what a buyer must pay for it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The report also does not prove that the person holding it owns the diamond. Proof of ownership and transaction compliance are separate matters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cDiamond certificate\u201d is a common consumer search term, but \u201cgrading report\u201d is usually more precise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A certificate can sound like a guarantee of quality, authenticity or value. A laboratory report records the findings from an examination performed under the laboratory\u2019s procedures and equipment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
GIA specifically describes its documents as reports rather than certificates, valuations or appraisals. Other organisations may use certification language in their marketing, but sellers should still understand the document\u2019s actual purpose and limitations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The important questions are what was examined, what conclusions were recorded and whether the report matches the current diamond.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The table below summarises typical report roles. Exact services and formats can change, so the individual document must always be read and verified.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is not a quality ranking. Each offer depends on the actual report, diamond and intended resale channel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A report allows the buyer to compare the diamond with market inventory. The easier that comparison is, the more confidently the buyer can estimate demand and resale potential.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If the laboratory is widely recognised by the intended market, the buyer may be less likely to require immediate regrading. This can reduce delay, shipping, laboratory fees and uncertainty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If the buyer has concerns about report equivalence or whether the diamond still matches the document, the offer may include an allowance for additional verification.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The report can therefore affect the transaction, but it does not create intrinsic value. It influences how confidently the existing value can be described and marketed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n No. The physical diamond remains the same stone regardless of the report issuer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A 1.00-carat natural diamond does not become heavier, brighter or cleaner because it is submitted to another laboratory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n What can change is the documented description and the market\u2019s confidence in that description. If two laboratories assign different grades, buyers may use different comparison groups when calculating an offer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is why a report can influence value perception without physically changing the diamond.<\/p>\n\n\n\n No. Identical-looking terminology should not be assumed to create perfect equivalence across every report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Each laboratory uses its own procedures, report formats, equipment, quality-control systems and terminology. Some grade names correspond closely, while others require interpretation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n HRD reports, for example, may display terminology such as \u201cLoupe Clean\u201d or historical colour descriptions alongside familiar letter grades. Laboratory-grown report formats can also differ substantially between organisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A professional buyer should read the report legend and examine the diamond instead of comparing only the headline letters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is possible for grading results to differ, particularly when a characteristic lies close to a grade boundary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Colour and clarity grading involve controlled professional observations. Although laboratories use established procedures, borderline stones can be interpreted differently.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Report type and eligibility rules may also vary. One service may provide an overall cut grade for a particular shape or category, while another may present different cut-related information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n No seller should assume that regrading will automatically improve the results. The new report could confirm the existing grades, raise one characteristic, lower another or use a different reporting format.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It can, especially in larger or higher-value natural diamonds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A difference between G and H colour or VS2 and SI1 clarity may change the inventory against which the buyer compares the stone. The financial effect depends on carat weight, shape, cut, condition and demand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The difference becomes more important near commercial thresholds. A diamond that moves into or out of a highly requested quality combination may reach a different buyer pool.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There is no universal amount for a one-grade change. The buyer must calculate it using current comparable diamonds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A GIA natural-diamond grading report can identify the stone as natural and record its carat weight, colour, clarity, shape, measurements and other characteristics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For qualifying standard round brilliant diamonds in the D-to-Z colour range, the report can include an overall cut grade. Polish, symmetry and fluorescence are also recorded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n GIA provides separate services for coloured diamonds and laboratory-grown diamonds. The exact report title matters because a natural-diamond report and a laboratory-grown assessment do not describe the same market category.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Report information can be checked through GIA\u2019s online verification service. The buyer must still confirm that the physical diamond matches the online record.<\/p>\n\n\n\n No. A GIA report can support broad market comparability, but it does not guarantee value or a buyer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A small, damaged or poorly cut GIA-graded diamond may receive a lower offer than a larger, more desirable diamond with a verifiable IGI or HRD report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The report also cannot protect a diamond from changing market conditions. A quality combination with limited demand may remain difficult to sell even when accurately documented.<\/p>\n\n\n\n GIA describes the diamond. The market determines what a buyer is prepared to pay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n IGI offers reports for natural and laboratory-grown loose diamonds, along with jewellery-report services.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A loose-diamond report may include the diamond\u2019s origin, shape, measurements, carat weight, colour, clarity and cut-related information. Depending on the report type, it may also contain a clarity diagram, proportions graphic and laser-inscription details.<\/p>\n\n\n\n IGI jewellery reports can document a finished piece containing natural or laboratory-grown diamonds and gemstones. This can be useful when the item should not be dismantled merely to obtain loose-stone information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n IGI reports can be checked through the organisation\u2019s online verification service. As with any laboratory, the physical item must still match the digital record.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yes, many professional buyers accept verifiable IGI reports.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Acceptance depends on the diamond category, report type, buyer and target market. IGI reports are particularly common in the laboratory-grown diamond and finished-jewellery sectors, although the organisation also grades natural diamonds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A buyer may still perform independent verification before issuing a final offer. This is standard risk control and does not automatically mean the report is being rejected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The offer should be based on the verified diamond rather than a generic deduction simply because the report is IGI.<\/p>\n\n\n\n HRD Antwerp issues reports for natural diamonds, laboratory-grown diamonds, coloured diamonds and jewellery through its available services.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A natural-diamond grading report records authenticity and key characteristics such as carat, colour, clarity and cut-related information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n HRD terminology can differ from the terms used on another laboratory\u2019s report. A buyer should interpret both the letter or numerical grade and the accompanying scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n HRD Antwerp reports are particularly familiar within Antwerp and many European trade contexts. Recognition can vary in other markets, but a verifiable HRD report remains useful gemological documentation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n They can be. International buyers who understand HRD terminology may accept the report directly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some downstream customers may be more familiar with another laboratory. In that situation, a dealer may consider regrading before resale and reflect that possibility in the offer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is a question of market fit rather than a claim that the physical diamond is inferior.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Before accepting a deduction, ask whether the buyer intends to regrade the stone and how the expected cost or grade risk was calculated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There is no universal answer for every diamond and destination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For a valuable natural loose diamond intended for broad international comparison, a GIA report is often selected because many buyers are familiar with its reporting system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n IGI may be especially practical for laboratory-grown diamonds or complete jewellery, depending on the report required. HRD Antwerp can be highly relevant when the diamond is being assessed or traded through Antwerp and European markets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The best report is authentic, appropriate for the diamond category, sufficiently detailed, verifiable and accepted by the buyers most likely to purchase the stone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Market recognition and technical grading should not be treated as the same concept.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A laboratory may be familiar in one region or product category and less familiar in another. That difference can affect resale convenience even when the report contains detailed information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Accuracy also depends on whether the report matches the physical diamond. An authentic document is not useful if it has been paired with the wrong stone or the diamond has been altered since grading.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A buyer must consider laboratory recognition, report integrity and physical consistency together.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Every report from the same laboratory does not contain identical information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A full natural-diamond grading report, a dossier, an identification report, a jewellery report and a laboratory-grown assessment serve different purposes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A jewellery report may describe mounted stones within practical limitations. A loose-diamond report can normally provide more precise carat weight and measurements because the complete stone is accessible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Before comparing laboratories, identify the exact document type. Comparing a mounted-jewellery report with a full loose-diamond report is not an equivalent comparison.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A loose diamond can be weighed and examined from every direction. This allows precise measurement and detailed grading.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A mounted diamond is partially concealed by metal. Its exact weight, colour, clarity, measurements or condition may be more difficult to establish.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Jewellery reports remain useful because they can document the entire piece without unnecessary dismantling. They are particularly relevant when brand, craftsmanship, design or period value may exceed the value of the loose components.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A buyer should not expect a mounted-jewellery report to provide every field available on a loose-diamond grading report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Natural and laboratory-grown diamonds must be clearly distinguished because they participate in separate resale markets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n IGI and HRD offer report services that document laboratory-grown diamonds. Their exact grading terminology and report layouts should be read directly from the document.<\/p>\n\n\n\n GIA uses a distinct assessment format for qualifying colourless-to-near-colourless laboratory-grown diamonds, with Premium or Standard descriptions rather than treating the document as a natural-diamond report. Older GIA laboratory-grown reports may use earlier terminology and remain relevant if authentic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reporting practices can change. The buyer should rely on the report actually issued rather than assuming that every document from the same laboratory follows the latest format.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A grading report does not automatically expire, but age can affect how confidently it describes the current diamond.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The stone may have been chipped, abraded, repolished, recut or treated after grading. The report\u2019s format may also provide less information than a modern service.<\/p>\n\n\n\n An older report can still be useful when it is authentic, verifiable and accurately matches the stone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A new report should only be recommended when the expected improvement in marketability justifies the cost, handling risk and delay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The report may still help identify the stone, but its quality description may no longer be complete.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A chip can affect weight, clarity, symmetry or durability. Recutting can change dimensions, carat weight, polish and other grades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A buyer must inspect current condition rather than relying solely on the historical document.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Any offer adjustment should relate to the actual damage and expected repair risk\u2014not merely to the report\u2019s age.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Begin with the official online verification service provided by the issuing laboratory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Enter the report number and compare the returned record with the paper or digital document. Check the carat weight, shape, measurements, colour, clarity and date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Then compare those details with the physical diamond. A professional may inspect the laser inscription and measure the stone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Online verification confirms that a record exists. It does not, by itself, prove that the diamond in front of you is the stone described in that record.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A laser inscription can help connect the diamond with its report number, but it should not be used alone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n An inscription must be read correctly and compared with the laboratory database. Measurements and identifying characteristics should also correspond.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The absence of an inscription does not automatically invalidate a report because not every diamond is inscribed. An inscription can also become difficult to see when the stone is mounted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Professional verification uses multiple matching characteristics rather than relying on one number.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yes. A real report could be presented with a different stone having broadly similar characteristics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is why online verification alone is insufficient. The buyer should match measurements, weight, shape, plotted characteristics and inscription where available.<\/p>\n\n\n\n High-value transactions may require specialised testing to confirm natural or laboratory-grown origin and detect treatments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A reputable buyer will complete these checks before taking ownership or releasing final payment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Only if the report type and wording state that the examined stone was identified as natural.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Never assume origin from the laboratory logo or the presence of a report number. Each document should clearly describe whether the diamond is natural or laboratory-grown.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Older terminology may differ, so the entire report must be read.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If origin is unclear or the document cannot be verified, additional screening or laboratory testing may be required.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Diamond treatments can alter colour or apparent clarity and may affect marketability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A recognised report may disclose detected treatments according to the laboratory\u2019s policies and service type. Sellers should submit the complete document, including comments and footnotes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A cropped image displaying only the 4Cs can hide treatment information or other important limitations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If treatment status is uncertain, the buyer may require further testing before confirming the offer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Fancy-colour diamonds require specialised reporting because their value depends heavily on colour origin, hue, tone, saturation and distribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A standard D-to-Z report should not be used to market a pale yellow stone as Fancy Yellow unless the documented grading supports that description.<\/p>\n\n\n\n GIA, IGI and HRD offer different coloured-diamond services. The exact report type, natural or treated colour determination and terminology must be reviewed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For an important coloured diamond, the target buyer\u2019s familiarity with the report can significantly affect marketability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It can. Laboratories may have different report scopes and cut-grading methodologies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n GIA assigns an overall cut grade to qualifying standard round brilliant diamonds within the applicable range. Fancy shapes do not receive that standard overall GIA cut grade, although polish, symmetry and measurements are reported.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Other reports may present cut information or terminology differently. Buyers should not assume that every Excellent or Ideal description is directly interchangeable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The physical diamond\u2019s proportions and face-up appearance still require assessment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It can influence how confidently buyers compare the documented grades with market inventory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Colour and clarity grades occupy ranges. A diamond close to a grade boundary may be interpreted differently during a separate examination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A buyer should not automatically claim that a report is \u201cone grade too high\u201d without inspecting the stone. Equally, a seller should not assume that identical letters from different reports guarantee identical market treatment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The responsible approach is to verify the diamond and explain any material discrepancy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Not automatically.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Regrading may be worthwhile for a valuable natural loose diamond if broader market recognition is likely to improve the net outcome. It may not make sense for a smaller diamond, mounted jewellery or a stone whose current report is already accepted by the intended buyer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The process involves laboratory fees, professional removal where applicable, secure shipping, insurance and time. The new grades are not guaranteed to match or improve upon the existing report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Obtain an initial offer first and compare the expected benefit with the complete cost and risk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Not automatically. An older, verifiable GIA report that matches an undamaged diamond may still provide sufficient information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Updating may be useful if the report lacks information required by the target market or if the stone has been repolished or recut.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The financial benefit should be estimated before the diamond is removed, shipped or submitted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A seller should not pay for a new report merely because a buyer makes an unsupported claim that every older report is unusable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yes. A diamond can still be assessed without its original GIA, IGI or HRD document.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The buyer must confirm that the stone is a diamond and determine whether it is natural, laboratory-grown or treated. Its carat weight, colour, clarity, cut, shape and condition must then be assessed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The initial estimate may be wider because less verified information is available. Physical inspection becomes especially important.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Read our guide to selling a diamond without a certificate<\/a> for more detail.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Imagine two fictional natural one-carat round diamonds. Both reports state G colour, VS2 clarity and Excellent cut.<\/p>\n\n\n\n One report was issued by GIA and the other by IGI. The buyer should not value the stones from the laboratory names alone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Measurements, proportions, fluorescence, inclusion appearance, condition and actual market demand must be compared. If both reports are authentic and both diamonds verify correctly, each can receive a serious offer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The final amounts may differ because of the physical stones and target markets\u2014not merely because the logos differ.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Consider a fictional 1.50-carat natural diamond with a current HRD Antwerp report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A professional Antwerp buyer may be familiar with the terminology and able to compare the stone directly with relevant market inventory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A buyer serving a market where another laboratory is more commonly requested might include the possibility of regrading in the offer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Neither approach proves that the HRD-graded diamond has changed. The difference concerns the buyer\u2019s downstream market and transaction strategy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Imagine a diamond with a fifteen-year-old report stating 1.02 carats and VS2 clarity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Physical inspection reveals a chip that occurred after grading. The online report is genuine, but it does not document the current condition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A lower offer in this situation reflects damage, possible recutting and weight-loss risk. It should not be presented simply as a penalty for the laboratory or report age.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suppose two laboratory-grown diamonds have reports from different laboratories.<\/p>\n\n\n\n One report presents detailed colour and clarity grades, while the other uses a broader quality assessment. Comparing only the terminology would be misleading.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The buyer must confirm the origin, measurements, quality, condition and present laboratory-grown market demand. Report format cannot erase the broader pricing conditions within that market.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Consider a fictional natural diamond reported as G colour.<\/p>\n\n\n\n During inspection, a buyer believes the stone is close to the G\u2013H boundary. That does not justify automatically pricing it as H without explanation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The buyer should consider the existing report, physical comparison and whether regrading is genuinely planned. The written offer should identify any condition attached to the grade verification.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A transparent process separates a legitimate grading concern from an unsupported attempt to reduce the price.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The buyer first verifies the report and checks that the diamond matches its identifying data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The documented carat, colour, clarity, cut, shape, fluorescence, polish and symmetry are then compared with current market demand. The buyer also examines physical condition, transparency and origin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If regrading, recutting or further testing is needed, the expected cost and risk may be included in the offer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Our pillar guide explains how diamond buyers calculate an offer<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ask every buyer to provide the verified grades used in the calculation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If one buyer discounts the diamond because of the laboratory, request a clear explanation. Find out whether regrading is required, which laboratory would be used and whether the offer is conditional on the result.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Compare the amount you will receive after all deductions. A higher preliminary figure can become a lower net offer if fees or grading conditions are introduced later.<\/p>\n\n\n\nLaboratory<\/strong><\/td> Common report coverage<\/strong><\/td> Typical resale consideration<\/strong><\/td><\/tr> GIA<\/td> Natural loose-diamond reports, coloured-diamond reports and distinct laboratory-grown assessment services<\/td> Broad international familiarity, especially for natural loose diamonds; exact report type and date remain important<\/td><\/tr> IGI<\/td> Natural and laboratory-grown loose-diamond reports, jewellery reports and specialised report services<\/td> Frequently encountered in natural, laboratory-grown and finished-jewellery markets; buyers verify the report and physical stone<\/td><\/tr> HRD Antwerp<\/td> Natural and laboratory-grown diamond reports, jewellery reports and coloured-diamond services<\/td> Established familiarity in Antwerp and European markets; terminology and exact report format must be interpreted correctly<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n How a Grading Laboratory Can Affect an Offer<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Does the Laboratory Change the Actual Diamond?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Are GIA, IGI and HRD Grades Automatically Equivalent?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Can the Same Diamond Receive Different Grades?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Does a One-Grade Difference Affect the Offer?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Understanding a GIA Diamond Report<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Does a GIA Report Guarantee the Highest Offer?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Understanding an IGI Diamond Report<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Are IGI Reports Accepted for Resale?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Understanding an HRD Antwerp Diamond Report<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Are HRD Reports Accepted Outside Europe?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Which Is the Best Diamond Grading Lab for Resale?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Market Recognition vs Grading Accuracy<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Report Type Can Matter More Than the Laboratory Name<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Loose-Diamond Reports vs Jewellery Reports<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Natural vs Laboratory-Grown Report Formats<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Does an Older Report Lose Its Value?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Does a Damaged Diamond Still Match Its Report?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
How to Verify a GIA, IGI or HRD Report<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Does a Laser Inscription Prove the Report Is Genuine?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Can a Genuine Report Be Used With the Wrong Diamond?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Does a Report Prove the Diamond Is Natural?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
How Treatments Affect Report Interpretation<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Reports for Fancy-Colour Diamonds<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Does the Laboratory Affect Cut-Grade Interpretation?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Does the Laboratory Affect Colour and Clarity Interpretation?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Should You Send an IGI or HRD Diamond to GIA Before Selling?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Should You Regrade an Older GIA Diamond?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Can a Buyer Make an Offer Without Any Report?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Illustrative Example: Same Stated Grades, Different Reports<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Illustrative Example: HRD Diamond in Antwerp<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Illustrative Example: Old Report and Current Damage<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Illustrative Example: Laboratory-Grown Report Formats<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Illustrative Example: A Borderline Colour Grade<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
How Buyers Use Reports to Calculate an Offer<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
How to Compare Offers Based on Different Lab Opinions<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n